What triggered your company’s shift toward a more strategic procurement model?

Initially, it was all about securing materials and services on time. But as costs rose and complexity grew – especially around EPCI contracts – we needed to think bigger. We pivoted to a crossproject and category-wide sourcing strategy. Instead of buying project by project, we consolidated demand to gain leverage, take a long-term view on supply, and reduce costs at scale.

Did that involve reshaping the supplier market?

Yes. Especially in civil construction where suppliers couldn’t meet our capacity needs. We helped them form consortia, sometimes between direct competitors, which was new in
our market. We also moved from rigid tenders to long-term contracts with value-sharing mechanisms. It wasn’t just about price – it was about building sustainable partnerships.

Collaboration between procurement and engineering can be tough. How did you establish it?

We started by shifting mindsets. Procurement was seen as back office. But with billions in spend at stake, fragmented thinking became a risk. We unified procurement, engineering
and controlling into one process. It took trust, transparency, and early proof-points to build alignment. Leadership and engagement were essential – transformation was driven by people, not just systems.

What role did data and technology play in achieving cost excellence?

A huge one. We had no single source of truth – data was everywhere. So, we centralized it with platforms like SAP Ariba and built dashboards to track spend, risks, savings,
and forecasts. This gave us visibility to act faster and more strategically. We standardized KPIs to measure impact.

How do you balance cost targets with sustainability goals?

ESG is integral. Most of our funding now comes from green bonds. About 90% of our CO2 footprint lies in our supply chain. So, we’ve integrated CO2 pricing into our evaluations and use tools like EcoVadis for supplier assessments. We align cost efficiency with climate goals – it’s not a trade-off but a requirement.

Have your contracting strategies evolved as well?

Absolutely. We’ve moved away from classic turnkey EPCI to more flexible frameworks. Sometimes using Cost+ models where risk is shared. We focus on long-term relationships –
setting basic terms first, then refining project specifics together. It’s more adaptable and fosters collaboration.

Looking ahead, what are the biggest challenges for procurement in energy?

Talent and time. We need skilled professionals who understand energy, data, and global supply chains. We also need clear longterm political direction. But the market is growing and new suppliers are entering, creating new opportunities. The key is staying agile while planning for the long game.

How is your team preparing for those future demands?

We’ve grown rapidly. Our focus now is on upskilling, market intelligence, and mapping supply chain risks beyond tier 1. The goal is resilience through data and insight, not just scale.

Reflecting on your journey, what were the biggest lessons?

First, get executive commitment early. Then, don’t get stuck in process design – focus on people. Communicate often. I personally met with every department to align goals. That
built trust. In the end, procurement transformation isn’t about software or templates – it’s about leadership, credibility, and delivering lasting value.